| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 23 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 29.30 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 29.30-29.30 (cM)
20.2-20.2 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | rs109343058 |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Comparison-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | 2.75E-5 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #166685
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were Chinese Holstein cows. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped using either the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip (imputed to HD) or the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler HD v2 chip and analyzed for M. paratuberculosis infection status. |
| Analysis: | Two approaches were used for GWAS: Genome-wide Rapid Association using Mixed model and Regression-Genomic Control (GRAMMAR-GC) and ROADTRIPS using RM test. |
| Software: | PLINK, Beagle, GenABEL in R, ROADTRIPS 2.0, GCTA |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Gao Y, Jiang J, Yang S, Cao J, Han B, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Yu Y, Zhang S, Zhang Q, Fang L, Cantrell B, Sun D |
| Affiliation: | Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Laboratory of Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China |
| Title: | Genome-wide association study of Mycobacterium avium subspecies Paratuberculosis infection in Chinese Holstein |
| Journal: | BMC genomics, 2018, 19(1): 972 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | GRAMMAR-GC method |
User inputs on reference #30591025
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
