| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 27 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 62.56 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 62.56-62.56 (cM)
36.5-36.5 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | rs208624037 |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Comparison-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | 6.1E-16 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | AGPAT6 (1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 6 (lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase, zeta)) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #140411
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were Braunvieh, Fleckvieh, and Holstein cattle. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped using the Illumina BovineSNP50 or BovineHD BeadChip, with data imputed to sequence level, and analyzed for SNP association with milk fat and protein percentage. |
| Analysis: | Association tests were carried out for each breed separately using a variance components-based approach. Meta-analysis of FP and PP across breeds was carried out using an inverse variance-based approach. |
| Software: | SAMtools, Minimac, FImpute, Beagle, Eagle, PLINK, EMMAX |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Pausch H, Emmerling R, Gredler-Grandl B, Fries R, Daetwyler HD, Goddard ME |
| Affiliation: | Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia |
| Title: | Meta-analysis of sequence-based association studies across three cattle breeds reveals 25 QTL for fat and protein percentages in milk at nucleotide resolution |
| Journal: | BMC genomics, 2017, 18(1): 853 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #29121857
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
