QTL Map Information |
Chromosome: | 6 |
QTL Peak Location: | 88 (cM) |
QTL Span: | 72.43-89.35 (cM) 63.5-78.3 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Upper, "Significant": | ILSTS097 |
Peak: | |
Lower, "Significant": | CSN3 |
Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Marker type: | Microsatellites |
Analysis type: | QTL |
Model tested: | n/a |
Test base: | n/a |
Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
F_Stat | 2.646 | P_values | 0.029 | Dominance effect: | n/a |
Additive effect: | n/a |
Associated Gene: | n/a |
Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
Extended information: |
(none) |
User inputs on QTL #1381
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
QTL Experiment in Brief |
Animals: | German artificial insemination organizations contributed 872 semen samples from 16 paternal half-sib families of the German Holstein breed. The number of sons per sire ranged from 19 to 127 (average 54.5). |
Breeds associated:
n/a
|
Design: | Phenotypic data were obtained from the United Data Systems for Animal Production (VIT, Verden, Germany) for 22 body conformation and behavior traits. |
Analysis: | A whole-genome scan covering all autosomes and the pseudoautosomal region of the sex chromosomes was performed with 264 genetic markers, which consisted of 247 microsatellite markers, 8 SSCP, 4 protein polymorphisms, and 5 erythrocyte antigen loci. |
Software: | |
Notes: | |
Links: | Edit |
Reference |
Authors: | S. Hiendleder, H. thomsen, N. Reinsch, J. Bennewitz, B. Leythe-Horn, C. Looft, N. Xu, I. Medjugorac, I. Russ, C. Kuhn, G. A. Bro |
Affiliation: | Tierzucht und Haustiergenetik der Justus-Liebig-Universitat, Giessen, Germany; Institut fur Tierzucht und Tierhaltung der Christian-Albrechts-Universitat, Kiel, Germany; Institut fur Tierzucht der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munc |
Title: | Mapping of QTL for Body Conformation and Behavior in Cattle |
Journal: | Journal of Heredity, 2003, 94(6): 496-506 |
Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |

User inputs on reference #14691316
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|